The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change-15.0% to $182.00
Predicted High$223.00at 1 month
Predicted Low$182.00at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)-15.0%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Jul 24, 2026 8:56 am
Bear
FNV trends lower to
$182.00
(-15.0% from $214.22)
by Jan 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisFNV trades well above every fair-value anchor but sentiment and gold panic-bid dominate near-term; an Aug 2 earnings print with a 3-for-3 beat streak likely sustains momentum through late summer, after which value gravity toward the $155-165 signal-adjusted anchor pulls the tape lower into year-end.
Invalidated ifAn earnings miss or gold reversal breaking $210 support, or conversely a sustained close above $235 on continued gold panic, invalidates the fade thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $214.22 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Jul 24, 2026
—
$214.22at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 7, 2026
$197.73–$230.71typical range · internal point $220.50
—
±7.7%
6/10
Earnings beat streak plus gold bid lifts pre-print
What actually happened:
closed $231.08
on Aug 6, 2026 = +7.9% vs the call
(predicted +2.9%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 4.9 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±7.7%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Aug 24, 2026
$190.33–$238.11typical range · internal point $223.00
—
±11.2%
5/10
Post-earnings drift higher on platform-monopoly narrative
What actually happened:
closed $265.74
on Aug 21, 2026 = +24.1% vs the call
(predicted +4.1%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 20.0 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.2%:
OUTSIDE the band
· S&P +3.5%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Sep 24, 2026
$215.00
—
+0.4%
5/10
Momentum cools, value gravity starts asserting
What actually happened:
closed $260.91
on Sep 23, 2026 = +21.8% vs the call
(predicted +0.4%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was up)
· off by 21.4 pp
· accuracy 3/10
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — lagged it
3 months
Oct 24, 2026
$205.00
—
-4.3%
5/10
Risk-off regime and rich multiple weigh
Matured — awaiting scoring. This checkpoint's date has passed; the next scorer run
(score-outcomes.php) records what actually happened.
Approaching $165 attractive zone but sentiment cushions
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$204.79
(-4.4%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.