The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+4.8% to $183.60
Predicted High$183.60at 6 months
Predicted Low$175.80in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 1, 2026 1:01 am
Neutral
BPOP trends range-bound to
$183.60
(+4.8% from $175.21)
by Feb 2027.
flat-then-break
ThesisBPOP is a low-beta compounder trading near composite fair value after a strong 6-month run. Value gravity slowly pulls toward the $180-185 anchor zone, but momentum has largely spent itself and a neutral regime caps upside. Path is a gentle drift higher with modest chop.
Invalidated ifClose below $161.50 (bear scenario) or above $205 breaks the drift thesis; regime shift to risk-off would also invalidate.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $175.21 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 1, 2026
—
$175.21at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 15, 2026
$168.67–$181.75typical range · internal point $175.80
—
±3.7%
7/10
Low beta, neutral regime, no catalyst; drifts flat
What actually happened:
closed $177.87
on Aug 14, 2026 = +1.5% vs the call
(predicted +0.3%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 1.2 pp
· accuracy 10/10
· typical range ±3.7%:
inside the band
· S&P +4.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 1, 2026
$165.73–$184.69typical range · internal point $176.90
—
±5.4%
6/10
Slow grind toward fair value, quiet tape
What actually happened:
closed $167.23
on Sep 1, 2026 = -4.6% vs the call
(predicted +1.0%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 5.5 pp
· accuracy 8/10
· typical range ±5.4%:
inside the band
· S&P +1.9%
over the same window — beat it
2 months
Oct 1, 2026
$178.50
—
+1.9%
5/10
Q3 earnings anticipation nudges price higher
What actually happened:
closed $155.45
on Sep 30, 2026 = -11.3% vs the call
(predicted +1.9%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 13.2 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +2.2%
over the same window — beat it
3 months
Nov 1, 2026
$180.20
—
+2.8%
5/10
Earnings beat likely given 3 of 4 track record
Matured — awaiting scoring. This checkpoint's date has passed; the next scorer run
(score-outcomes.php) records what actually happened.
4 months
Dec 1, 2026
$181.50
—
+3.6%
4/10
Post-earnings drift toward composite fair value
5 months
Jan 1, 2027
$182.80
—
+4.3%
4/10
Year-end positioning, boring compounder favored
6 months
Feb 1, 2027
$183.60
—
+4.8%
3/10
Converges near DCF and composite anchors
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$182.50
(+4.2%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$175.21
Composite fair value
$180.70
Signal-adjusted fair value
$204.27
DCF fair value
$184.58
Anchored-PE fair value
$172.93
Buy-below (value lens)
$155.00
Value net score
+24
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+38
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)