The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+17.5% to $165.00
Predicted High$165.00at 6 months
Predicted Low$142.50in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 13, 2026 1:04 am
Bull
LDOS trends higher to
$165.00
(+17.5% from $140.38)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisLDOS trades well below composite fair value ($172) with a risk-on tape, recent Q2 beat, and AI-defense tailwind supporting a gradual re-rating. Near-term momentum from the beat carries prices modestly higher, then value gravity toward $170s dominates over the 6-month window.
Invalidated ifA break below $130 on volume or a defense budget shock/contract loss would falsify upward drift; regime flip to risk-off also negates.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $140.38 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 13, 2026
—
$140.38at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Aug 27, 2026
$129.24–$151.52typical range · internal point $142.50
—
±7.9%
6/10
Post-beat drift continues in risk-on tape
What actually happened:
closed $137.43
on Aug 26, 2026 = -2.1% vs the call
(predicted +1.5%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 3.6 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±7.9%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.6%
over the same window — lagged it
1 month
Sep 13, 2026
$124.24–$156.52typical range · internal point $145.00
—
±11.5%
6/10
Momentum plus AI-cloud defense narrative supports grind higher
What actually happened:
closed $128.86
on Sep 11, 2026 = -8.2% vs the call
(predicted +3.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 11.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±11.5%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.8%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 13, 2026
$149.50
—
+6.5%
5/10
Value gap begins closing as buyers step in
What actually happened:
closed $121.60
on Oct 12, 2026 = -13.4% vs the call
(predicted +6.5%)
· direction MISS
(called up, was down)
· off by 19.9 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· S&P +0.1%
over the same window — lagged it
3 months
Nov 13, 2026
$154.00
—
+9.7%
5/10
Next earnings window; beat history supports move
4 months
Dec 13, 2026
$158.50
—
+12.9%
4/10
Continued re-rating toward composite fair value
5 months
Jan 13, 2027
$162.00
—
+15.4%
4/10
Value gravity dominates; low beta smooths path
6 months
Feb 13, 2027
$165.00
—
+17.5%
4/10
Converges near deterministic baseline below fair value
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$163.54
(+16.5%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$140.38
Composite fair value
$172.12
Signal-adjusted fair value
$201.09
DCF fair value
$197.52
Anchored-PE fair value
$179.67
Buy-below (value lens)
$130.00
Value net score
+38
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+63
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)