Made on
Aug 14, 2026
Price at call
$255.04
6-month call
Bear -19.6%
Target by Feb 2027
$205.00
Great value below
$170.00
Model
v0.6.0
Projection vs Actual (6M history + forecast)
Forecast Change
-19.6% to $205.00
Predicted High
$278.00
at 1 month
Predicted Low
$205.00
at 6 months
Max Drawdown (predicted)
-19.6%
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded. Predicted Aug 14, 2026 12:51 am
Bear
NBIS trends lower to
$205.00
(-19.6% from $255.04)
by Feb 2027.
ride-then-fade
ThesisNBIS is a narrative-driven AI infra name riding a blowout print into a risk-on tape; momentum and beta 4.58 favor near-term upside continuation, but with value lens deeply negative and no earnings catalyst for months, expect a fade as the AI-capex trade digests into year-end and profit-taking meets stretched multiples.
Invalidated ifA break below $200 within 30 days, or regime flip to risk_off with AI-capex narrative rolling over, invalidates the ride-then-fade and points to accelerated mean reversion toward the $170 attractive level.
| Checkpointtime after the call | Datewhen it gets graded | Predictedthe claim: closing price | Current priceactual close — fills in over time | Predicted returnpredicted vs $255.04 at call | Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10 | Driverwhy the brain put the point here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prediction made | Aug 14, 2026 | — | $255.04 at call | — | — | The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date. |
| 2 weeks | Aug 28, 2026 | $184.45–$325.63 typical range · internal point $268.00 | — | ±27.7% | 6/10 | post-print momentum, risk-on tape, high-beta bid continues |
| What actually happened: closed $218.48 on Aug 27, 2026 = -14.3% vs the call (predicted +5.1%) · direction MISS (called up, was down) · off by 19.4 pp · accuracy 4/10 · typical range ±27.7%: inside the band · S&P -0.7% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 1 month | Sep 14, 2026 | $152.75–$357.33 typical range · internal point $278.00 | — | ±40.1% | 5/10 | AI-infra narrative peaks, retail chase into September |
| What actually happened: closed $224.55 on Sep 11, 2026 = -12.0% vs the call (predicted +9.0%) · direction MISS (called up, was down) · off by 21.0 pp · accuracy 4/10 · typical range ±40.1%: inside the band · S&P -1.7% over the same window — lagged it | ||||||
| 2 months | Oct 14, 2026 | $262.00 | — | +2.7% | 4/10 | first profit-taking wave, no catalyst, next print looms |
Matured — awaiting scoring. This checkpoint's date has passed; the next scorer run
(score-outcomes.php) records what actually happened.
|
||||||
| 3 months | Nov 14, 2026 | $245.00 | — | -3.9% | 4/10 | earnings uncertainty, value lens gravity begins pulling |
| 4 months | Dec 14, 2026 | $230.00 | — | -9.8% | 3/10 | year-end de-risking on high-beta winners, tax selling |
| 5 months | Jan 14, 2027 | $215.00 | — | -15.7% | 3/10 | January reset, quality/value concerns reassert |
| 6 months | Feb 14, 2027 | $205.00 | — | -19.6% | 3/10 | drift toward $170 attractive zone as narrative cools |
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets $0.00 (+0.0%) — both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it. Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
0 blocking · 1 degraded · 7 notes — follow the chain top-down (cause → effect).-
Degraded
No usable fair-value anchor — brain-only (anchorless) mode: no v0.3 control line, prediction reasons from lenses/sentiment/regime/price behaviour.
-
Note
Traditional FCF-based DCF produces misleading results — company reinvests aggressively
-
Note
EPV is meaningless — the entire value proposition is future growth/optionality
-
Note
PE-based peer comparisons may fail — market values this outside its nominal industry
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: composite_fair_value.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: dcf.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: anchored_pe.
-
Note
Valuation anchor absent: signal_adjusted.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.Value anchors (from deep analysis)
| Price at call | $255.04 |
| Composite fair value | — |
| Signal-adjusted fair value | — |
| DCF fair value | — |
| Anchored-PE fair value | — |
| Buy-below (value lens) | — |
| Value net score | -73 |
| Value confidence | 7 / 10 |
| Quality net score | -41 |
| Memo confidence | — / 10 |
| Deserved value (base) | — |
| Quality tilt | — |
| Deserved value (used) | — |
| Coherence (value × quality) | — |
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)
| Realized volatility (annualized) | 1m 186.7% 3m 138.9% 6m 122.5% |
| Daily σ (realism noise) | 8.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1m 7.03 3m 4.58 5m 3.72 |
| Trailing 6-month return | 187.8% |
Knobs (equation params)
| ladder | ["w2","m1","m2","m3","m4","m5","m6"] |
| llm_model | claude-opus-4-7 |
| max_tokens | 3000 |
| control_knobs | {"w_dcf":0.5,"k_qual":0.200000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"reach_6m":0.450000000000000011102230246251565404236316680908203125,"coh_floor":0.5,"conf_gain":0.059999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"noise_phi":0.84999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,"conf_floor":0.40000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625,"w_composite":0.5,"noise_window":"3m","flat_band_pct":5,"horizon_months":6,"noise_sigma_fallback":0.01499999999999999944488848768742172978818416595458984375} |
| Neutral band (%) | 5 |
| earnings_brief | v1 |
| prompt_version | p1 |
| control_version | v0.3.0 |
Version & Tech Chain
What produced this prediction — stamped on the record so versions can be compared by success rate later.
Model
v0.6.0
#8eb3df85c300 Tech composition (what this version is built from)
| # | Process | Kind | Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synthesis valuation-synthesis |
deterministic | final |
| 2 | Scenario Analysis scenario-valuation |
deterministic | valuation |
| 3 | Valuation / Mispricing ext-lens-value |
llm | extended |
| 4 | Company Quality ext-lens-quality |
llm | extended |
| 5 | Forensic Memo (combiner) ext-forensic-memo |
llm | extended |
| 6 | Classification company-classification |
llm | foundation |
| 7 | Live Quote fmp-quote |
data | market-data |
Inputs used (the runs that fed this prediction)
| Upstream process | Ran | Lag | Run id |
|---|---|---|---|
company-classification |
Aug 14, 2026 | freshest | NBIS-20260814-001304-ee79 |
ext-forensic-memo |
Aug 14, 2026 | freshest | ext-NBIS-20260814-003900-a62c |
ext-lens-quality |
Aug 14, 2026 | freshest | ext-NBIS-20260814-003900-a62c |
ext-lens-sentiment |
Aug 14, 2026 | freshest | ext-NBIS-20260814-003900-a62c |
ext-lens-value |
Aug 14, 2026 | freshest | ext-NBIS-20260814-003900-a62c |
scenario-valuation |
Aug 14, 2026 | freshest | NBIS-20260814-001304-ee79 |
valuation-synthesis |
Aug 14, 2026 | freshest | NBIS-20260814-001304-ee79 |
Inputs flagged 7d+ behind the freshest one may be stale relative to the rest of the analysis.
Saved History
3 frozen snapshots — the record we score once predictions mature.Not Yet Modeled
What this v0.6.0 forecast deliberately ignores — the work ahead, in plain sight.- Scenario probabilities — one path, no bull/bear split (base_prob = 1.0).
- Intraday / sub-2-week behaviour — the first claim is at 14 days by design (EOD product).
- Position sizing / portfolio context — the path is a price claim only.