The masterbrain's trajectory (blue, curved through its 7 checkpoints), the deterministic v0.3 control (dashed), and the actual price (green) overlaid from the prediction date forward.
Forecast Change+21.1% to $44.10
Predicted High$44.10at 6 months
Predicted Low$36.90in 2 weeks
Forecast
The masterbrain trajectory — 7 dated checkpoints. Short rungs (2w, 1m) show the typical range as the primary claim; point calls run from 2 months out. Every claim still gets graded.
Predicted Aug 19, 2026 7:13 pm
Bull
G trends higher to
$44.10
(+21.1% from $36.41)
by Feb 2027.
dip-then-recover
ThesisGenpact trades well below composite fair value with quality intact and sentiment quietly turning constructive in a risk-on tape; no earnings catalyst inside the window means the re-rate should be gradual, with value gravity pulling toward the mid-40s over six months.
Invalidated ifBreak below $34 on rising volume or regime flip to risk-off invalidates the gradual re-rate thesis.
Checkpointtime after the call
Datewhen it gets graded
Predictedthe claim: closing price
Current priceactual close — fills in over time
Predicted returnpredicted vs $36.41 at call
Conv.brain's confidence, 1–10
Driverwhy the brain put the point here
Prediction made
Aug 19, 2026
—
$36.41at call
—
—
The anchor — every point below is measured from this price and date.
2 weeks
Sep 2, 2026
$33.30–$39.52typical range · internal point $36.90
—
±8.5%
6/10
quiet drift higher as AI-services narrative supports tape
What actually happened:
closed $37.69
on Sep 1, 2026 = +3.5% vs the call
(predicted +1.4%)
· direction HIT
(called flat, was flat)
· off by 2.2 pp
· accuracy 9/10
· typical range ±8.5%:
inside the band
· S&P -1.0%
over the same window — beat it
1 month
Sep 19, 2026
$31.91–$40.91typical range · internal point $37.60
—
±12.4%
6/10
risk-on regime and low beta keep bid steady
What actually happened:
closed $34.14
on Sep 18, 2026 = -6.2% vs the call
(predicted +3.3%)
· direction MISS
(called flat, was down)
· off by 9.5 pp
· accuracy 4/10
· typical range ±12.4%:
inside the band
· S&P -0.8%
over the same window — lagged it
2 months
Oct 19, 2026
$38.80
—
+6.6%
5/10
value buyers accumulate below fair value anchors
Matured — awaiting scoring. This checkpoint's date has passed; the next scorer run
(score-outcomes.php) records what actually happened.
3 months
Nov 19, 2026
$40.20
—
+10.4%
5/10
Q3 print likely another beat extends streak
4 months
Dec 19, 2026
$41.50
—
+14.0%
4/10
year-end positioning toward quality compounders
5 months
Jan 19, 2027
$42.80
—
+17.6%
4/10
gradual re-rate toward anchored-PE $49 target
6 months
Feb 19, 2027
$44.10
—
+21.1%
4/10
value gravity pulls toward signal-adjusted $53 fair value
Why ranges on the short rungs?
A 102-prediction trial (2026-07-21) showed 2-week point calls carry no information here —
three prompt formulations all lost to simply predicting zero — while the stock's own
volatility scale (σ×√t) described those windows well. So the short rungs claim what's
actually knowable: the typical travel, with earnings timing flagged where the variance
will come from. The internal point calls keep being generated and graded to map where
real skill begins. Full evidence: stocks/predictions/V0.5-DESIGN.md §8.
Deterministic control (v0.3 value line) targets
$48.71
(+33.8%)
— both lines get graded at every checkpoint, so the brain has to beat the formula, not just replace it.
Brain: claude-opus-4-7.
Weaknesses
No weaknesses recorded for this run.
All inputs present, no fallbacks used — nothing to flag.
Equation Inputs
Everything feeding the v0.6.0 model — value anchors, the stock's own price behaviour, and the tunable knobs.
Value anchors (from deep analysis)
Price at call
$36.41
Composite fair value
$58.45
Signal-adjusted fair value
$53.38
DCF fair value
$69.90
Anchored-PE fair value
$49.40
Buy-below (value lens)
$34.00
Value net score
+31
Value confidence
6 / 10
Quality net score
+64
Memo confidence
6 / 10
Deserved value (base)
—
Quality tilt
—
Deserved value (used)
—
Coherence (value × quality)
—
Price behaviour (trailing — shapes the realism line)